[Inx] Learning Tool or Complete Distro? Was: Qingy: GUI login
d.kuntadi at gmail.com
Sat Nov 22 21:54:27 PST 2008
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Samson Wong <samsonctwong at gmail.com> wrote:
> Promoting it as a complete desktop also eases comments about the iso size in
> a way; expectations management. Though I wonder, assuming one tool per job,
> (mostly - unless we're all vim converts), using it as a desktop, and using
> some discretion, how such bigger would "full featured" be? I am very likely
> to be wrong, but don't think it would be "that" much, especially if people
> are consequently willing to accept a bigger iso because its full featured.
> (Yes, I sidestepped much of the cli vs framebuffer talk, and much of the
> answer to the above turns on that etc)
> Anyone have a list of what makes up INX by size?
Talking about size, my personal opinion is as near as 700 MB would be
the best, but not more. If I burn 100 MB iso on 700 MB CD, I feel I
just wasted 600 MB. This is one of the reason I run INX on QEMU (using
iso file instead of burning it to CD). It is just my personal feeling
though as I don't pay for bandwidth I use. Other people paying
bandwidth surely feel it differently.
More information about the Inx