[Inx] Thread Two: RC-3 or not?
astraljava at kapsi.fi
Sun Sep 14 23:55:01 PDT 2008
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 04:39:07PM +0930, Karl Goetz wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 07:00 +0300, Janne Jokitalo wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 07:10:48AM +1000, Peter Garrett wrote:
> > > Should there be an RC-3?
> ccing in inx-devel again.
Sorry, which list this belongs again? :)
> > > Should we have an "inx-unstable" that gets all the latest crack?
> > Yes, this is a sane approach. I think Debian does it just fine. Have a 'sid',
> > from which we release stable ones every now and again.
> While it would be nice, debians number of devs is slightly larger.
This is true. Only slightly, and not for long :D
> > <snip> Been a lifelong fan of Peter's posts on ubuntu-users@ ( :-o ), and
> > have a fascination towards shells and scripting them.
> fanboy :P
Guilty as charged. :)
> > Unfortunately, since we're building a house now, my time has been limited for
> > personal agendas, and Inx has got the least of it. But I plan on being more
> > active in the near future, so don't be too surprised if you see my name/nick
> > every once in a while around the project. :)
> *waves* good to see you,
> i'll probably bump into you around other derivatives too :)
Hopefully so, but from the looks of it (#ubuntu-derivative, I mean), not likely.
Wonder what need to do to get it light up, but that's a whole 'nother story...
More information about the Inx