[Inx] Thread Two: RC-3 or not?

Karl Goetz karl at kgoetz.id.au
Wed Sep 10 00:09:07 PDT 2008

On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 07:00 +0300, Janne Jokitalo wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 07:10:48AM +1000, Peter Garrett wrote:
> > Should there be an RC-3?

ccing in inx-devel again.

> > Should we have an "inx-unstable" that gets all the latest crack?
> Yes, this is a sane approach. I think Debian does it just fine. Have a 'sid',
> from which we release stable ones every now and again.

While it would be nice, debians number of devs is slightly larger.

> My 2 (euro-)cents. :)
> Oh, and many of you will now wonder, whose?! My name is Janne, people call me
> Jaska or AstralJava around the freenode.org. I have been working on Ubuntu
> Studio and Fluxbuntu projects for quite some time now, and thus involved with
> derivatives. Been a lifelong fan of Peter's posts on ubuntu-users@ ( :-o ), and
> have a fascination towards shells and scripting them.

fanboy :P

> Unfortunately, since we're building a house now, my time has been limited for
> personal agendas, and Inx has got the least of it. But I plan on being more
> active in the near future, so don't be too surprised if you see my name/nick
> every once in a while around the project. :)

*waves* good to see you,
i'll probably bump into you around other derivatives too :)

Karl Goetz <karl at kgoetz.id.au>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.inx.maincontent.net/pipermail/inx-inx.maincontent.net/attachments/20080910/a9cf59b0/attachment-0002.pgp>

More information about the Inx mailing list