[Inx] Thread Two: RC-3 or not?

[Karl Goetz]

On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 07:10 +1000, Peter Garrett wrote:
> Should there be an RC-3?
> 
> Should the next INX version be 1.0 ?

Is it bug free and documented? if yes, 1.0 sounds good!

> 
> Is it almost ready to be 1.0? Should we do the "E" and "Google" thing
> and be in perpetual Beta/ RC / Version 0.99999 repeated?

GRUB do it to.
And i think its silly :O

> 
> Should we have an "inx-unstable" that gets all the latest crack?

depends if you want to maintain both at once - i expect it would be
worth having one, but i dont see me offering to maintain it (thus, i
wont say 'yes, do it').
kk

> 
> RSVP....
> 
> Peter
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Inx mailing list
> Inx at lists.inx.maincontent.net
> http://lists.inx.maincontent.net/listinfo.cgi/inx-inx.maincontent.net
-- 
Karl Goetz <karl at kgoetz.id.au>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.inx.maincontent.net/pipermail/inx-inx.maincontent.net/attachments/20080910/163b5a3e/attachment-0002.pgp>