[Inx] Thread Two: RC-3 or not?
jared.bernard at gmail.com
Mon Sep 8 14:15:36 PDT 2008
Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Peter Garrett wrote:
> Should there be an RC-3?
> Should the next INX version be 1.0 ?
> Is it almost ready to be 1.0? Should we do the "E" and "Google" thing
> and be in perpetual Beta/ RC / Version 0.99999 repeated?
> Should we have an "inx-unstable" that gets all the latest crack?
> "INX Is Not X" Live CD based on Ubuntu 8.04 : http://inx.maincontent.net
> Screenshots slideshow: http://inx.maincontent.net/album/1.png.html
I've always preferred the 2008.xx versioning or something else that
reflects the date. I definitely don't like the perpetual beta. An unstable
is a good idea.
More information about the Inx