[Inx] Thread Two: RC-3 or not?

[Jared Bernard]

Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Peter Garrett wrote:

> Should there be an RC-3?
>
> Should the next INX version be 1.0 ?
>
> Is it almost ready to be 1.0? Should we do the "E" and "Google" thing
> and be in perpetual Beta/ RC / Version 0.99999 repeated?
>
> Should we have an "inx-unstable" that gets all the latest crack?
>
> RSVP....
>
> Peter
>
> --
> "INX Is Not X" Live CD based on Ubuntu 8.04 : http://inx.maincontent.net
> Screenshots slideshow: http://inx.maincontent.net/album/1.png.html
>
I've always preferred the 2008.xx versioning or something else that 
reflects the date. I definitely don't like the perpetual beta. An unstable 
is a good idea.
Jared