[Inx] Qingy: GUI login

[Shelagh Manton]

On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:14:55 +0700
"David Kuntadi" <d.kuntadi at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Karl Goetz <karl at kgoetz.id.au> wrote:
> > My random thought:
> > If inx wants to be CLI/no X based, does that include covering
> > everything up with framebuffer?
> >
> > "No X" and "CLI" are different - afaik the projects always used them
> > interchangeably, but they are slightly different.
> 
> Have you forgotten we have "links2 -g" ? It utilized Framebuffer.
> 
> If we could have firefox and office suite compiled using framebuffer,
> I believe INX would be the only choice for low end computers.

But it would not longer be inx - it would be a derivative of inx. Which
is fine, but inx is small and it *is* the scripts, not just the
framebuffer as impressive as it is.

Shelagh
> 
> Regards,
> David
> _______________________________________________
> Inx mailing list
> Inx at lists.inx.maincontent.net
> http://lists.inx.maincontent.net/listinfo.cgi/inx-inx.maincontent.net


-- 

----------------------------------------------------------------
Jabber: shelagh.manton at gmail.com
----------------------------------------------------------------